Article 368
Also: amending power, constituent power of Parliament

Background and evolution
This page looks at the text of Article 368 and the legal struggle over its meaning; for the history and list of individual amendments, see the separate entry on constitutional amendments.
As originally enacted, Article 368 was titled "Procedure for amendment of the Constitution" and did not say in so many words where the power to amend came from. That silence became the centre of a long dispute. In Golaknath (1967), a majority of eleven judges held that the article only laid down procedure, that the power itself came from Parliament's general law-making power, and that an amendment was therefore "law" under Article 13 and could not abridge Fundamental Rights.
Parliament replied with the 24th Amendment (1971). It renamed the article "Power of Parliament to amend the Constitution and procedure therefor", declared in clause (1) that Parliament acts "in exercise of its constituent power", and added clause (3) stating that Article 13 does not apply to amendments. In Kesavananda Bharati (1973), the Supreme Court upheld the 24th Amendment but, by a seven-to-six majority, held that the word "amend" itself carries a limit: the power cannot be used to destroy the basic structure.
You've read your 3 free glossary pages this month
Create a free account to read 5 full pages a month, or upgrade for unlimited access. The definition above, the A–Z index and the pop-up definitions in lessons stay free.
Last reviewed: 23 October 2026 · Original UPSCPrep.in content.